starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

The this and that of airsoft.
Post Reply
thebutnugget
I love forums!
I love forums!
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:35 am

starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by thebutnugget » Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:57 pm

your thoughts? might pick one up, to start a new CQB build




http://weaponblender.com/Airsoft-Guns/A ... p5383.html
[align=center]V[/align]

User avatar
Avenger
I do in fact have a life.
I do in fact have a life.
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:47 pm
Location: It's a secret.

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by Avenger » Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:26 pm

Go with a G&G Combat Machine. KWA rifles have slight compatability issues, if you're planning on internal upgrades that would be a problem.
I do not always accidentally, but when I do, I accidentally the whole thing.

User avatar
SteevoLS
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5323
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:16 am
Location: Columbia

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by SteevoLS » Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:40 pm

Ehh... I think its safe to say a KWA 2GX gearbox is a bit higher up the food chain than a G&G Combat Machine. For most people's purposes that gearbox should run indefinitely.
Image
There's no kill switch on awesome!

marpat96
I do in fact have a life.
I do in fact have a life.
Posts: 976
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Aiken-Augusta

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by marpat96 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:00 pm

Avenger wrote:Go with a G&G Combat Machine. KWA rifles have slight compatability issues, if you're planning on internal upgrades that would be a problem.
^this

You can put regular aftermarket parts such as pistons is there, but the stock gears and everything else is pretty hardcore, as in its pretty damn tough. The motor can be replaced, as the barrel and hopup, but I don't see why you would need to with the hopup.
Last game I went to: Redfox, March 29th, 2014
(Stolen from Gerbilizer :D)

User avatar
captainkirk05
I love forums!
I love forums!
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:35 pm
Location: Greenville, SC

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by captainkirk05 » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:23 am

The big proprietary parts on the KWA are the cylinder nozzle, air nozzle, hop up unit, and gearbox shell. Most everything else is interchangeable, including pistons, gears, trigger assembly, on and on...

If you change one of these "air seal" proprietary parts, be ready to replace the rest as well to make them mesh and seal correctly.

Gambler
AJAXian
AJAXian
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:02 am

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by Gambler » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:06 pm

The thing is that you can run a KWA for at least 2 years or so before you have to worry about replacing anything.
You name a game, I've been to it.

If I've banned you, then you have more than likely deserved it.

If I deleted a post it didn't need to be there or I simply didn't like it.

Rev
I love forums!
I love forums!
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:51 am
Location: Conway
Contact:

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by Rev » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:26 pm

I have owned G&G and KWA. Both are great guns and you wont go wrong with them, but, KWA is the best way to go. You can run it forever and not worry about a problem unless you just really beat the crap out of it or do not treat it right.
Image

thebutnugget
I love forums!
I love forums!
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:35 am

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by thebutnugget » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:02 pm

she is on her way via ups! wahhooo!!
[align=center]V[/align]

marpat96
I do in fact have a life.
I do in fact have a life.
Posts: 976
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Aiken-Augusta

Re: starting a new project gun.. KWA CQR MOD2 ?

Post by marpat96 » Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:16 am

thebutnugget wrote:she is on her way via ups! wahhooo!!
Alright! She'll be great to ya man
Last game I went to: Redfox, March 29th, 2014
(Stolen from Gerbilizer :D)

Post Reply